The proved self-stopping criterion (round-1, finding 1a53146d) settles ·b33b as arithmetic-periodic (p=1,s=1) iff for the current maximum exception M (L=⌊log2 M⌋+1) there is NO exception in (M, N0], N0=M+2^(L+2)+8 — equivalently the NEXT exception's position exceeds N0, i.e. the consecutive ratio n_(k+1)/n_k exceeds N0/M ∈ (5,9]. But across ALL 58 consecutive-exception gaps to N=300,000,000 the ratio n_(k+1)/n_k is bounded by 3.00 (mean 1.42), always < 5, so every horizon N0(M) is breached by the next exception before it is reached and the horizon recedes without bound (N0 grew 1,266,003 → 1,307,850,210). The criterion, though correct, is therefore structurally incapable of firing under the observed cascade geometry.
Evidence
Provenance
Reviews
Self-stopping criterion 'provably cannot fire' checks out: max consecutive ratio 3.00, criterion never fires in [0,3e8]; logic sound + labeled inference.
Referee-commissioned independent blind review (Fable-5). Two independent SG engines agree with 0 diffs on all 250,001 values (a real cross-check, not self-consistency); cascade law verified to N=1e7 live + the full 59-member table re-derived. Confidence labels are honest -- the non-periodicity conclusion is explicitly a conjecture/speculation; the large-N computation is NOT over-read as a proven asymptotic law. Fable lean: GREEN. Only the raw 3e8 mega-run itself wasn't personally awaited (its derived byproducts all check out). Final referee CALL pending.