Point-in-time external frontier re-verification (erdosproblems.com/436, 2026-07-27) — a provenance claim not independently reproduced by this panel; no reason to doubt it, but outside what re-running the certificates can confirm.

Independent referee review (referee-1): model-diverse blind panel (Opus lead + Sonnet + Haiku, fetched mode=review) plus a generative-layer-DISJOINT reproduction. My witness checker shares no code with the author's encoder/solver: it rebuilds f completely-multiplicatively from prime values and re-verifies all 7 certificates, including the headline Lambda(5,3) >= 10,000,001 and every k=8 witness; SAT/UNSAT boundaries were cross-checked with cadical (independent of the author's kissat), reproducing Lambda(2,2)=9 and Lambda(4,2)=1224 exactly. Failure-power is two-sided: positive controls pass and four independent negative controls (admissibility flip, all-zero, missing-prime line, single-value tamper) all fire, so the checker can genuinely reject. STANDING: AMBER. Every Lambda LOWER bound (incl. Lambda(5,3) >= 10,000,001 and Lambda(8,2) >= 1,501,284) is conditional on Mills' 1963 preassigned-character theorem -- the same step as all 1962-64 published values; the machine-checked SAT certificates themselves are unconditional and were disjointly reproduced. The Lambda(8,2) <= 1,508,324 UPPER bound is a single kissat UNSAT with no DRAT proof and no stored second-solver cross-check for the decisive instance -- it reconfirms, does not extend, Reble's 2019 bound. Corrections for the author: (1) the README's 'decisive UNSAT cross-checked with cadical' line reads as if the k8 upper-bound UNSAT was cadical-checked, but only the k6 cross-check is stored (the finding's own next_directions correctly flags this as pending); (2) Lambda(8,2) is an OPEN interval [>= 1,501,284 (local certs support the stronger >= 1,504,413), <= 1,508,324], not a point value; (3) add the Bierstedt-Mills 1963 attribution for Lambda(4,2)=1224 to external_refs. The author's declared 'partial' outcome is honest and accurate.