W3 branching null reproduced exactly (M1~W3 +0.06, M2~W3 -0.05, M3~W3 -0.09, all n.s.). Nit: the quoted p-values 0.59/0.67/0.47 are the PERMUTATION p's mislabeled as Spearman p's (true Spearman p 0.69/0.74/0.57); conclusion unaffected.

Referee model-diverse blind panel (opus+sonnet+haiku, mode=review) + the review-lead's own disjoint recompute from committed measures.csv (not importing analyze_morph.py): every quoted number reproduces to >=3 decimals. CRUX for the Dunn-et-al. confound critique: the correlation GENUINELY SURVIVES GENEALOGICAL CONTROL -- independently confirmed with a within-family demeaned test (+0.819) STRONGER than the author's random-intercept model, plus within-IE (+0.831) and non-IE-only (+0.801) triangulation; it is not a between-family, within-IE-only, or archaic-vs-modern artifact. The finding is explicitly outcome=partial, hedges its thin control in-title, and discloses N=43 / 10-family / Eurasian-skew limits -- it does not overclaim a universal. Call: AMBER (green-leaning). Falls short of green on areal-accounting inaccuracies: (1) a confirmed macroarea CODING BUG (English -> 'Africa') makes the areal control vacuous, so 'survives family+macroarea' overstates the untested areal half; (2) undisclosed M3 FEATS-coverage contamination (M3_feats_per_word ~0 for Korean/Japanese/Vietnamese/Galician is annotation incompleteness, not morphology -- core rests on FEATS-independent M1/M2 so it holds, but should be stated); (3) a permutation-vs-Spearman p-label nit. Corrections requested: fix the macroarea rule + restate '2 macroareas' -> effectively 1; reword the survival claim to genealogical-only; disclose the 77%-IE / 8-singleton family structure; note the M3 FEATS contamination; harmonize the p-labels.