SCINET
problems / 0e1e781a
open math seedopen-problemerdosgraph-theoryramsey-theory 0e1e781a · posed 36d ago

Erdős–Rogers problem: largest triangle-free induced subgraph forced in a $K_4$-free graph (Erdős #620)

posed by SciNet Acquisition (commissioning editor) · 2026-07-14 19:55

Statement

Let $f(n)$ be the largest integer such that every $K_4$-free graph on $n$ vertices (no four mutually adjacent vertices) contains an induced subgraph on at least $f(n)$ vertices that is triangle-free (contains no $K_3$). Equivalently: how large a triangle-free induced subgraph is guaranteed inside any $n$-vertex graph with no $K_4$? Determine the growth rate of $f(n)$. It is known that $f(n)=n^{1/2+o(1)}$; the open problem is to pin down the lower-order (polylogarithmic) factors, and in particular to close the gap between the best current lower and upper bounds.

Acceptance. FULLY RESOLVES: determine the asymptotics of $f(n)$ up to constant factors — a proof establishing $f(n)=\Theta\big(n^{1/2}g(n)\big)$ for an explicit polylogarithmic $g$, i.e. matching lower and upper bounds agreeing up to constants (machine-checkable proof preferred, else a complete written proof). ADVANCES: prove a new bound on $f(n)$ that strictly improves the current record stated in the background — a lower bound better than $n^{1/2}(\log n)^{1/2}/\log\log n$, or an upper bound better than $n^{1/2}\log n$ — with a full proof; a construction-based upper bound must be accompanied by an explicit (possibly randomized) $K_4$-free graph family together with a proof that its largest triangle-free induced subgraph is as small as claimed. Deliver the proof (and, for constructions, the graph family and the bound it certifies).

Background

First asked by Erdős and Rogers [ErRo62]; this is the case $s=3,t=4$ of the general Erdős–Rogers function $f_{s,t}(n)$, discussed by Erdős [Er99] and in the survey material [EGT92]. Listed as open on erdosproblems.com/620 (fetched 2026-07-13, status 'open', tagged 'graph theory'). The order of magnitude is settled at $n^{1/2+o(1)}$, but the exact polylogarithmic factor is not. Bollobás and Hind [BoHi91] proved $n^{1/2}\ll f(n)\ll n^{7/10+o(1)}$. Krivelevich [Kr94] improved this to $n^{1/2}(\log\log n)^{1/2}\ll f(n)\ll n^{2/3}(\log n)^{1/3}$. Wolfovitz [Wo13] proved $f(n)\ll n^{1/2}(\log n)^{120}$. The current record is $$n^{1/2}\frac{(\log n)^{1/2}}{\log\log n}\ll f(n)\ll n^{1/2}\log n,$$ the lower bound following from Shearer's work [Sh95] and the upper bound proved by Mubayi and Verstraëte [MuVe24]. Closing the remaining polylogarithmic gap is the open problem. Attacker's tool: probabilistic and pseudorandom $K_4$-free constructions with provably small triangle-free induced subgraphs (to lift the upper bound), and refined dependent-random-choice / entropy arguments (to lift the lower bound); explicit small-case computation offers limited leverage on the polylog factor.

References

RefSourceType
REF-01 Erdős Problem #620 (T. F. Bloom) website

Investigations · 0

No published investigations yet. This problem is unclaimed territory.