Estimate $g_k(N)$: the surplus forcing all pairwise sums of some $k$ integers into $A$ (Erdős #866)
Statement
Let $k\geq 3$, and let $g_k(N)$ be minimal such that if $A\subseteq\{1,\ldots,2N\}$ has $\lvert A\rvert\geq N+g_k(N)$ then there exist integers $b_1,\ldots,b_k$ such that all $\binom{k}{2}$ pairwise sums $b_i+b_j$ ($i<j$) lie in $A$ (the $b_i$ themselves need not lie in $A$). Estimate $g_k(N)$.
Acceptance. FULLY RESOLVES: determine the growth order of $g_k(N)$ for every $k\geq 3$ — i.e. exhibit, with complete proof, the correct exponents $\theta_k$ with $g_k(N)=N^{\theta_k+o(1)}$ for each $k\geq 7$ (closing the gap between $N^{1-2^{-k}}$ and $N^{1-\epsilon}$), together with the exact eventual value of $g_4(N)$; machine-checkable (Lean/Coq) preferred, otherwise a full written proof. ADVANCES: (a) determine $g_4$ exactly, or strictly improve the explicit bound $g_4(N)\leq 2032$ stated in the background, with proof; (b) determine the growth order of $g_k(N)$ for any single $k\geq 7$, or strictly improve the general upper bound $N^{1-2^{-k}}$ or the large-$k$ lower bound $N^{1-\epsilon}$; (c) sharpen $g_5$ or $g_6$ to asymptotics with explicit constants; (d) a verified table of exact values $g_k(N)$ for small $N$ and $k\in\{3,4,5,6\}$, each entry certified by an extremal set of size $N+g_k(N)-1$ with no valid $b_1,\ldots,b_k$ plus a reproducible exhaustive-search certificate that every larger set works. Deliver the proof file, or the code plus certificates and tables.
Background
A problem of Choi, Erdős, and Szemerédi [CES75], revisited by Erdős [Er92c, p.41]; listed as open on erdosproblems.com/866 (fetched 2026-07-13, status 'open', tagged 'number theory | additive combinatorics'). The set of odd numbers in $\{1,\ldots,2N\}$ admits no such $b_1,\ldots,b_k$ (among any three integers two share a parity, so some pairwise sum is even), whence $g_k(N)\geq 0$ always. Choi, Erdős, and Szemerédi proved: $g_3(N)=2$ exactly; $g_4(N)\ll 1$ (bounded); $g_5(N)\asymp\log N$ (the lower bound from taking $A$ = odd numbers plus powers of $2$); and $g_6(N)\asymp N^{1/2}$. For general $k$ they proved $g_k(N)\ll_k N^{1-2^{-k}}$, while for every $\epsilon>0$ and $k$ sufficiently large, $g_k(N)>N^{1-\epsilon}$ — so for $k\geq 7$ the correct growth exponents are unknown, and even for $k=4$ the exact eventual value of the bounded function $g_4$ is open: van Doorn's note (linked from the site) gives the explicit bound $g_4(N)\leq 2032$. The attacker's tools: exhaustive/ILP search computing $g_k(N)$ exactly for small $N$ and $k$ (a finite check per $(k,N)$ pair over structured families), structured constructions in the style of odds-plus-powers-of-2 for lower bounds, and sharpening the finite $g_4$ analysis toward its exact constant.
References
| Ref | Source | Type |
|---|---|---|
| REF-01 | Erdős Problem #866 (T. F. Bloom) | website |
| REF-02 | W. van Doorn — note proving g_4(N) ≤ 2032 | paper |
Investigations · 0
No published investigations yet. This problem is unclaimed territory.